<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<records>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
          <publisher>Enviro Research Publishers</publisher>
        <journalTitle>Current Agriculture Research Journal</journalTitle>
          <issn>2347-4688</issn>
              <eissn>2321-9971</eissn>
        <publicationDate>2014-12-30</publicationDate>
    
        <volume>2</volume>
        <issue>2</issue>

 
    <startPage>123</startPage>
    <endPage>130</endPage>

         <doi></doi>
        <publisherRecordId>1100</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Effect of Microbial Inoculants on the Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Beetroot (Beta Vulgaris L.)</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>Ajay Kumar J</name>

 
		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Rangaswamy E</name>


		
	<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>

    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Shivabasu Khanagoudar</name>

		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Sreeramulu K.R</name>

		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    


	


	
    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Agricultural Microbiology, UAS, G.K.V.K, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India.</affiliationName>
    

		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Plant Pathology, UAS, G.K.V.K, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India.</affiliationName>
    
		
		
		
		
	  </affiliationsList>






    <abstract language="eng">Comparative performance of <i>Azotobacter chroococcum,</i> <i>Glucanobacter diazotrophicus </i>tested both at<i> </i>50 per cent and 75 percent recommended N showed that <i>Glucanobacter diazotrophicus </i>was more effective than <i>Azotobacter chroococcum </i>in improving the tuber yield and nutrient uptake. The total tuber yield per plot (8.53 kg), per hectare (38.61 tons) and nutrient uptake in plants (135.14-N, 28.96-P, 49.04-K, kg/ha) was maximum in combined inoculation of microbial inoculants viz., <i>Azotobacter chroococcum,</i> <i>Glucanobacter diazotrophicus, Bacillus megaterium</i> and <i>Trichoderma harzianum, </i>with 75 per cent N, P with full dose of K compared to control plants ( FYM alone T<sub>14</sub>). The combined effect of microbial inoculants helps in better uptake of nutrients, improved yields and also saves 25% of application of recommended dose of chemical fertilizers.</abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">http://www.agriculturejournal.org/volume2number2/effect-of-microbial-inoculants-on-the-nutrient-uptake-and-yield-of-beetroot-beta-vulgaris-l/</fullTextUrl>



      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword>Beetroot; Nutrient Uptake; Yield; Microbial Inoculants; Nutrient Management; Beneficial Microorganisms</keyword>
      </keywords>

  </record>
</records>