Bioassay Study of Azadirachtin and Plumbagin on Pericallia ricini (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae)

In recent years, the overuse of commercially obtainable synthetic pesticides against phytophagous insects has augmented their bioaccumulation in the biosphere, foremost to increased resistance and reduced soil biodiversity. Moreover, extreme uses of insecticides enter various environmental resources as an outcome of overflow, initiating deleterious health problems to agriculturalists and consumers of agricultural products. Hence, more attention is being paid towards the expansion of substitute eco-friendly insecticides that will help in an effective pest management system and also prevent longstanding exposure that causes diseases. As a result, important ecologically friendly and harmless alternative practice strategies to artificial compounds are essential. Azadirachtin and plumbagin (phytoproducts) have been identified as an extraordinary biocontrol agent with low toxicity and high efficacy among many plant products for latent chemotherapeutic compounds in plant pest and disease management systems. The biocidal effectiveness of neem is attributed to its azadirachtin active ingredient, which affect some metabolic processes in insects such as protein synthesis, deviations in biological fitness, reduced sexual communication, and chitin synthesis. Similarly, Plumbagin (Napthaquinones) have established substantial attention in agricultural chemistry because of a novel action mode, extremely high activity against a broad spectrum of insects, low acute toxicity to mammals, and environmentally benign characteristics. The present study indicated that Azadirachtin and Plumbagin can be significant alternatives to Chemical insecticides for Pericallia ricini control in short-cycle crops.


Introduction
In the last two to three decades, the bioactivity of phytochemicals has attracted increasing interest due to their potential use as insecticides against phytophagous insects. 1 Studies on phytochemicals and plant extracts have long been carried out to create pesticide substitutes that do not hurt human health and the environment.According to reports, pesticides derived from plants may alter the ratio of different biochemical elements in the body of an insect, alter the internal metabolism of the insect and lead to a reduction in activity or death.It is well known that these phytochemicals protect plants from insect pest attacks. 2 Insect feeding and oviposition on plants are influenced by phytochemicals produced in response to pest infestation.Phytochemicals have demonstrated various activities that can alter specific physiological processes in insects. 3-4-5est and disease control has been attempted on thousands of plants.Currently, several horticultural mineral oils, vegetable oils, essential vegetable oils, and detergents are used worldwide to control pests and diseases. 6Among all the biopesticides and plants that fight diseases, neem has proven to be the best choice.
Due to the presence of limonoid triterpenes, [7][8] the neem tree Azadirachta indica A.Juss (Meliaceae) has attracted attention as one of the most well-known biopesticides.Most of the research has been done on Azadirachtin, a limonoid found in the seeds of the Indian neem tree, A indica.Neem seed extract, rich in Azadirachtin, has strong anti-feeding and growthregulating effects on insects. 9-10-11Similarly, the limonoids present in Sentang (Azadirachta excelsa) are known to be effective feeding suppressants against a variety of pest species and have no adverse effects on beneficial insects, animals and humans. 12Methanol preparations from A. excelsa wood were toxic to Crocidromia vinotalis larvae and impaired their development and feeding.] Most phytophagous insects are effectively inhibited by Azadirachtin, but its effectiveness varies by species. 16It has excellent anti-feeding properties against grasshoppers, the desert locusts.
Species most susceptible to neem extracts include butterflies. 171][22] Therefore, these sublethal effects are important to evaluate, as they may significantly impact the population dynamics of this lepidopteran pest and contribute to its control. Plumbagin and naphthoquinones, especially 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthaquinone, are an important group of natural compounds that are very useful for the development of effective pesticides due to their abundance and relatively low toxicity.According to a literature review, Plumbagin from Plumbago zeylanica has many important biological effects, including antibacterial, 25 cytotoxic, 26 antimalarial, 27 antifilarial 28 and antiprotozoal properties. 29The naphthoquinone skeleton, with its abundant abundance and favourable structural properties, is an excellent model for producing effective feeding suppressants.It has previously been demonstrated that ingestion of crude aqueous methanol extracts of P. zeylanica and its derivatives results in failure of the moulting cycle in another lepidopteran insect, the silkworm (Bombyx mori).It has been shown to inhibit chitin formation and act as an insect repellent against a variety of lepidopteran pests. 30The biological action of Plumbagin has been documented against two species namely D. koenigi and D. cingulatus. 31ul 32 pointed out that plant defences against insect herbivores usually never depend on a single component.Rather, many compounds interact with pests individually or together.] In some situations, that period may be lost or long-term in nature. 35The American bollworm H. armigera (Hubner) was exposed to the antifeeding effects and reduction of ecdysteroid titers by two well-known natural substances, Plumbagin from P. capensis and Azadirachtin from A. indica.This altered the activity of lysosomal enzymes and resulted in obvious morphological abnormalities during metamorphic molting36.Many studies have found that Azadirachtin and Plumbagin, which represent specific structural requirements for activity, are unchanged.Therefore, the authors of this study present the synthesis and evaluation of the antifeeding effects of Plumbagin and Azadirachtin on Pericallia ricini (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae).

Materials and Methods
Culture of the Insects in the Laboratory P.ricini eggs and freshly emerged first-stage larvae were collected from castor plants grown near Madurai and stored at room temperature for the duration of the study (R.H).Fresh castor leaves were fed to the larvae were left to metamorphose into moths.The moths were treated with a sucrose (10% sucrose) solution soaked in small pieces of cotton.Males and females were housed in cages specially designed for mating.Laid eggs on the castor leaves put in the cage.Egg hatching was complete on the leaf.Fresh first-stage larvae were collected and separated from the eggs.These individuals were then stored in the laboratory.

Preparation of Plant Chemicals Azadirachtin
Azadirachtin brand name Neemazal (5%) was obtained from the local market.2.5 ml, 5 ml, 7.5 ml and 10 ml of azadirachtin were dissolved in 100 ml of distilled water separately to obtain concentrations of 25 ppm, 50 ppm, 75 ppm and 100 ppm for oral treatment.Similarly, for topical treatment, 1 ml, 2 ml and 3 ml of azadirachtin were dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water to obtain solution of 100 ppm, 200 ppm and 300 ppm concentration.10 µL of the above solution was taken and applied topically to each larva.

Assessing larvicidal Activity
For topical treatment, 50 µl of 0.01ppm, 0.02ppm, 0.025ppm, 0.035ppm, 0.05ppm, 0.075ppm and 0.1ppm of Plumbagin were applied topically to the newly formed fifth stage larvae P.ricini epidermis.For oral treatment, fresh castor leaves were immersed in the test solution (control leaves in distilled water) for 30 seconds, drained and allowed to dry on filter paper for 30 minutes.Similarly, 10 µl of 100 ppm, 200 ppm, 300 ppm Azadirachtin were topically applied to the epidermis of newly emerged fifth instar larvae of P.ricini.For oral treatment, fresh castor leaves were immersed in a solution of 25 ppm, 50 ppm, 75 ppm and 100 ppm Azadirachtin for 30 seconds (control leaves in distilled water), drained and allowed to dry on filter paper for 30 minutes.At least twenty larvae per concentration were used in all experiments.And these experiments were repeated three times.Twenty-five larvae were placed in 250 ml plastic containers.For comparison, a separate control using acetone (1 µl per insect) was kept at the same time.Mortality at 24 h and 48 h was calculated for each concentration.The death rate was calculated. 37r cent larval mortality = Number of dead larvae / Total number of treated larvae X 100 Abbott's corrected mortality = % mortality in treatment -% mortality in control / 100 -% mortality in control X 100

Results
Figure (1-4) summarize the insecticidal activity of two phytochemicals, namely Plumbagin and Azadirachtin, by both oral and topical administration.Plumbagin was administered orally and topically at concentrations of 0.01ppm, 0.02ppm, 0.025ppm, 0.035ppm, 0.05ppm, 0.075ppm and 0.1ppm.Similarly, oral Azadirachtin was administered at 25 ppm, 50 ppm, 75 ppm and 100 ppm and topical Azadirachtin was also administered at 100 ppm, 200 ppm and 300 ppm.Oral administration of Plumbagin causes statistically significant mortality in the larval stage.Subsequently, complete larval mortality was observed with 100 ppm oral Azadirachtin treatment and 80% larval mortality with 75 ppm oral Azadirachtin treatment.However, 50% larval mortality was observed at 50 ppm oral Azadirachtin treatment and 25% mortality was also observed at 25 ppm oral Azadirachtin treatment.Thus, no larval mortality was observed in control larvae (Figure 3) and 83.3% mortality was observed at 300 ppm with topical application.71.6% larval mortality was observed with topical application of 200 ppm Azadirachtin and 61.6% larval mortality with 100 ppm Azadirachtin (Figure 4).

Discussion
The present study highlighted that Plumbagin and Azadirachtin at different doses had inhibitory effects on the life cycles of P.ricini.As the concentration of Azadirachtin and Plumbagin increases at each stage of development, their toxicity also increases.Similar results have been observed and reported by several pest control workers. 38-39-40The relative effectiveness of the doses of Plumbagin and Azadirachtin can be ranked based on the percentage of larval mortality at each dose level.The current study showed that two herbal compounds, Azadirachtin and Plumbagin, can be quite successful, although their effectiveness varies.At concentrations of 50 mg/ml, 75 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml, oral and topical administration of Plumbagin effectively reduced larval mortality.An increase in mortality was observed at a dose of 100 mg/ml of oral Plumbagin.
Similarly, two compounds related to plumbagin, juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) and 2 -h y d r o x y -1 , 4 -n a p h t h o q u i n o n e , s h o w e d inhibitory effects on insect ecdysis when tested at concentrations up to 2500 ppm. 30Mulampurat et al 41 also observed inhibition of feeding in Opisina arenocelis at higher doses (4 and 5 ug) of Plumbagin.Sumathy and Sanjayan 42 also investigated the effect of Plumbagin on the post-ingestive effects of food consumption at concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ppm against third instar larvae of S. litura.Insects, 39 the inability to use the food they ate and digested caused a significant decline in individuals and increase in total mass.Banerjee et al. 43 showed that plumbagin has growth regulating properties in insects.Plumbagin has been shown to have anti-feeding activity against many insect species in previous studies. 42en Plumbagin was applied topically, a concentration of 100 mg/ml caused 50% mortality.Therefore, the oral and topical concentrations of Plumbagin were determined to be 100 mg/mL, 75 mg/mL, and 50 mg/mL, respectively.Similar findings were reported by Villavicencio and Perez-Escandon, 44 who tested Plumbagin against Dactylotum coralllinum (Saussur) and Phoetaliotes nebrascencis (Thomas) and found it to have insecteating properties.This larval mortality may be due to a decrease in chitin synthesis activity. 43For proper ecdysis, high hemolymph pressure and muscle activity must be supported by a proper cuticle.Larvae with impaired nutrition, secretion or motility are the result of inhibition of ecdysis.Affected larvae are subsequently killed 30 and as a result significant toxicity to P.ricini has been observed.
In addition, Plumbagin inhibits the chitin synthesis of Trichoplusia ni by about 30%.Pink bollworm had the lowest effective dose for 50% growth inhibition (ED 50 = 150 ppm), while three other test species including Heliothis zea, H. virescens and T. ni (ED 50 = 350 ppm) had comparable ED 50 values.Because Plumbagin is unique to chitin-bearing insects, its insecticidal activity as an ecdysis inhibitor may make it more environmentally friendly than traditional neurotoxic insecticides.As a result, Plumbagin has been shown to be an effective toxic biopesticide against P. ricini and is a strong candidate for the title of "leading compound" in the study of synthetic pesticides.
Commercially available neem seed extracts have various pest control properties, including direct toxicity, anti-feeding and anti-oviposition effects, and effects on insect growth, fecundity and metamorphosis. 45Lepidoptera exhibit strong antecedencies ranging from <1-50 ppm, contingent on the species, and are very susceptible to Azadirachtin. 46Acetone leaf extract of A. indica was found to have anthelmintic activity against S. litura. 47sman 16 found little variation in mortality of Pieris brassicae after treatment of 1-day-old fifth-instar larvae with 5.0 and 2.5% Azadirachtin.This study and the same toxic effect on P. ricini provide evidence of adverse effects of azadirachtin when used topically and orally.The present findings are supported by Mancebo et al. 48 The phytochemicals investigated in the present study -Plumbagin and Azadirachtin -all showed varying degrees of inhibition of feeding.Mortality of Plumbagin was 50% at 100 mg/ml oral and topical concentrations tested.At 50 ppm and 100 ppm oral and topical Azadirachtin treatment resulted in 50% mortality.Ulrichs and Mewis 52 reported that mortality increased after a single treatment with a Neem product at doses of 0.01, 0.1, 0.2 and 1.0 g Azadirachtin/kg of rice.
In this investigation, the insecticidal activity of both Plumbagin and Azadirachtin was enhanced at concentrations of 100 ppm for Plumbagin applied topically and orally, and 50 ppm for oral and 100 ppm for topical application.According to the study and observations that showed that water loss increased with increasing doses of Plumbagin and Azadirachtin and mortality increased, this can be considered as one of the main causes of larval death.Thus, the introduction of compounds of plant origin can have a significant positive effect on the environment and the economy.In addition, these experiments showed that Plumbagin and Azadirachtin are more toxic to P.ricini.

Conclusion
The

Fig. 1 :
Fig. 1: Per Cent Larval Mortality of P. ricini After the Oral Application of Plumbagin.

Fig. 2 :
Fig. 2: Per Cent Larval Mortality of P. ricini After the Topical Application of Plumbagin.

Fig. 3 :
Fig. 3: Per Cent Larval Mortality of P. ricini after the Oral Application of Azadirachtin.

Fig. 4 :
Fig. 4: Per Cent Larval Mortality of P. ricini after the Topical Application of Azadirachtin.