Not a member yet? Register now and get started.

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

Tillage System, Crop Residues and Nitrogen to Improve the Productivity of Direct Seeded Rice and Transplanted Rice

Avtar Singh, Rajneesh Kumar and J. S. Kang

Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004



Rice is grown by different techniques for higher productivity with judicious use of inputs and natural resources. Transplanting of paddy seedlings is common method of crop establishment in the irrigated rice systems of Asia but transplanting is labour intensive (30 persons/ha/day). The preparation of land for transplanting paddy (puddling) consumes about 20-40 % of the total water required for growing of crop and subsequently poses difficulties in seed bed preparation for succeeding wheat crop in rotation. It also promotes the formation of hard pan which effects rooting depth of next crop. So, in this paper discussed the different methods of establishment of rice, sowing of rice in the crop residue of wheat with different tillage systems and use of nitrogen for higher productivity of rice.


Methods of establishment, transplanting, seedlings, water, labour, puddling

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Singh A, Kumar R, Kang J. S. Tillage System, Crop Residues and Nitrogen to Improve the Productivity of Direct Seeded Rice and Transplanted Rice. Curr Agri Res 2014;2(1). doi :

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Singh A, Kumar R, Kang J. S. Tillage System, Crop Residues and Nitrogen to Improve the Productivity of Direct Seeded Rice and Transplanted Rice. Curr Agri Res 2014;2(1). Curr Agri Res 2014;2(1). Available from:


Rice is one of the most important cereal crops and provides food security and livelihood for millions of people across the globe. It is the main staple food crop of India, covering an area of about 43.97 mha with the total production and productivity of 104.32 mt and 2.37 t/ha of rice, respectively during 2011-2012 (Anonymous 2013a). In Punjab, rice was grown on an area of 28.18 lakh ha with the total production and productivity of 105.42 lakh t and 3.74 t/ha, respectively during 2011-2012 (Anonymous 2013b). To meet the future demand, world rice production must increase by more than 60 per cent in the next 30 years (IRRI 1989), which is possible only if soil, water resources and inputs are used more efficiently.

In the recent years, the rural labour had migrated towards the industrial sector, which had led to the non-availability of labour for transplanting of rice at the appropriate time. It results in delayed transplantation of rice as per the schedule, thereby resulting in yield reductions. This method also results in drudgery among women workers (Budhar and Tamilselvan, 2001). Transplanting of paddy seedlings is common method of crop establishment in the irrigated rice systems of Asia but transplanting is labour intensive (30 persons/ha/day). The preparation of land for transplanting paddy (puddling) consumes about 20-40 % of the total water required for growing of crop and subsequently poses difficulties in seed bed preparation for succeeding wheat crop in rotation. It also promotes the formation of hard pan which effects rooting depth of next crop (Bhuiyan et al 1995).

Zero tillage or reduce tillage establishment is used widely for many crops around the world and this technology has potential to allow saving in time, energy, water and labour during rice establishment (Piggin et al 2002). It has therefore growing significance due to receding water table (Humphyreys et al 2004), rising costs of labour for transplantation of paddy (Singh et al 2005) and adverse effects of puddling on the soil health (Timsina and Connor 2001).

Rice is predominantly grown as puddled transplanted crop in Punjab. The farmers in Punjab transplant rice from 10 June when the daily evaporation rate is very high (8-10 mm/day). The underground water is being over exploited by excessive pumping to meet the water requirement of transplanted rice. As a consequence, it has been causing a sharp decline in ground water table. Therefore, need has been felt to develop technically viable and economically feasible alternate techniques for growing rice in this region. The preliminary research conducted at Punjab Agricultural University (PAU) indicated that dry direct seeded rice could be a viable alternative to transplanted rice.

Dry DSR differs from transplanted rice in terms of crop establishment as well as subsequent crop management practices. The broadcast sowing/ drilling/ dibbling of dry seeds in soil is called DSR. However, it offers many advantages such as more efficient water use, high tolerance to water deficit, less methane gas emission, reduced cultivation cost, prevents the formation of hard pan in sub-soil and minimizes labour input (Balasubramanian and Hill 2002). It is more conducive to mechanization and also eliminates transplanting shock. Preliminary studies conducted at the PAU, Ludhiana showed that DSR can also be sown successfully without seed bed preparation for several benefits. This type of rice establishment method is also called ZT rice.

N is kingpin in any performance to increase agriculture production. Rice is the major consumer of fertilizer nitrogen and gives high response to applied N. N is the most limiting nutrient for rice growth and yield in almost all environments (Yoshida 1981, Roy and Mishra 1999). One major consequence of inadequate N is reduced leaf area, thereby, limiting light interception, photosynthesis and finally biomass growth, grain yield and water productivity (Sinclair 1990).

Substantial yield and water productivity gains are possible with the application of appropriate dose of N and it varies with location, climate, input availability and genetic potential of rice varieties. The low N use efficiency has been mainly due to its rapid mineralization and proneness to losses through different pathways before it is utilized by the crop. Application of appropriate quantity of N at the right time is, therefore, one of the most important factors to realize high yield and N use efficiency.

There has been decline in yield of rice and wheat in rice-wheat (RW)cropping system (Yadav 1998, Duxbury et al 2000) and one of the factors responsible is decline in soil fertility, specially the soil organic matter content (Olk et al 1996). Hence, there is an emphasis on building up soil organic matter and one of the ways is to recycle the crop residues. When the wheat is harvested by combine machine, it leaves 25-30 cm high stubbles and spreads the straw on the ground. This wheat straw remains in field un-decomposed during the hot months of May and June due to lack of moisture and when the rice is transplanted in the first week of July with the onset of monsoon rains the residue immobilizes the N applied to rice and crop suffers. To overcome this problem, most farmers remove or burn the wheat residue in the field. In addition to loss of plant nutrients like N, P, S (Biederbeck et al 1980), residue burning creates health and environment problems (Graham et al 1986, Prasad and Power 1991). Keeping the above into consideration, the present paper was prepared to determine the influence of tillage systems in relation to wheat residue management and nitrogen level on the productivity of  rice with the objectives  to see the effect of tillage systems and nitrogen levels on the growth and their interactive effect on productivity of rice.


A no-till (NT) system is a soil management technique that reduces soil disturbance, increases soil organic matter accumulation and can also increase crop yield (Bayer et al 2000, Santos et al 2011, and Crusciol et al 2012). NT and minimum tillage (MT) systems can produce rice grain yield similar to those produced with conventional puddling (Mabbbayad and Buencosa 1967, Mittra and Pieris 1968, De Datta et al 1979 and Rodriguez and Lal 1979). It has also been reported that in clay soil, MT produced the similar grain yield as through puddling (Sharma et al 1988). The rice yield was statistically at par in case of zero tillage (ZT) when compared with the conventional tillage (CT) system in direct seeding rice (DSR) (Bhatacharaya et al 2006). It was further reported that ZT may be adopted as resource conservation technology (RCT) and producing good crop yield. Another study reported that DSR with conventional seeding (in the prepared field) or rotavator (RT) seeding was better than zero till seeding. However, soil quality parameters (viz. soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration, bulk density and moisture content) were significantly better under conservation tillage (ZT and RT) than CT (Bazaya et al 2009). CT recorded significantly higher yield than ZT (Bhatacharaya et al 2006). Another study recorded that the direct seeded ZT gave at par yield as compared with transplanted (TP) rice (Singh et al 2008). ZT rice after spray of glyphosate @ 0.5 kg a.i/ha gave significantly higher yield over the other methods of establishment.

The establishment of rice under different tillage systems proved that rice can be successfully grown under zero-till transplant and proved to be more suitable alternative of conventional method of puddled transplant. The grain yield of rice under ZT (6.74 t/ha) was significantly higher than puddled transplant (6.19 t/ha). Similar results were also reported by Reddy (2004). Experiments were conducted at farmers field to study the effect of  ZT system on the growth and yield of rice and observed that grain yield of rice under ZT (6.36 and 6.74 t/ha) was similar to the puddled transplant (6.33 and 6.72 t/ha) in 2002 and 2003, respectively (Reddy et al 2005). Saharawat et al (2010) reported that number of effective tillers was numerically (9 per cent) higher in DSR as compared to the CT rice.  However, Kumar et al (2005) studied the effect of different planting methods on the productivity of rice at farmer’s field. They were observed that number of effective tillers, spike length and 1000-grain weight was maximum under ZT, which was at par with the unpuddled transplant. Thus as a result, the rice yield was statistically at par in ZT when compared with the unpuddled transplant and puddled transplant. The highest pooled yield (8.5 t/ha) of rice was recorded with drum seeding (wet bed) followed by direct seeding under dry bed and mechanical transplanting-puddled compared to manual transplanting-puddled and mechanical transplanting in unpudddled conditions (Gangwar et al 2009). The more the yield under DSR/drum rice was mainly due to more number of effective tillers/m2.

The direct seeded CT plots had similar grain yield as the direct seeded ZT plots of rice and wheat after 4 years of cropping (Bhattacharyya et al 2008). But the ZT practice had lower cultivation costs and crops under ZT could be sown earlier than CT (Singh et al 2002). However, the significantly same grain, straw and biological yield was recorded with ZT in standing stubbles after removal of loose straw, CT with and without mulching (Singh 2010).

Sharma et al (1995) observed that the higher total productivity of 9.3 t/ha was recorded under direct seeded, puddled condition, followed by transplanting (9.1 t/ha) and direct seeded, dry condition (8.99 t/ha). Owing to substantial saving of labour under direct-seeded, puddle condition higher net returns of  `14741/ha was obtained compared with `498/ha under direct-seeded, dry condition and  `12981/ha under TP.

Weeds are very serious problem in DSR as compared to (TP) transplanted rice (Walia et al 2006). Weeds represent one of the major resources consuming and limiting factors in crop production of growth inhibiting compound a phenomenon referred as allelopathy (Sanjay et al 2006). Aerobic soil conditions and dry-tillage practices, besides alternate wetting and drying conditions, are conducive for germination and growth of highly competitive weeds, which cause grain yield losses of 50–91 % (Elliot et al 1984 and Fujisaka et al 1993). Thus, timely weed control is crucial to increasing rice productivity. Herbicides are considered to be an alternative/supplement to hand weeding. The development of new, improved herbicides for dry-seeded rice is also needed (Gupta et al 2003). Several pre-emergence herbicides including butachlor, thiobencarb, pendimethalin, oxadiazon, oxyfluorfen, and nitrofen alone or supplemented with hand weeding, have been reported to provide a fair degree of weed control (Estorninos and Moody 1988, Janiya and Moody 1988, Moorthy and Manna 1993, Pellerin and Webster 2004). But, some difficulties are associated with pre-emergence herbicides, such as their limited application duration (0–5 DAS) and requirement of adequate soil moisture at the time of their application. In such situations, post-emergence herbicides are superior. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate different pre and post-emergence herbicides that are formulated from time to time to provide wider options to farmers for weed control in rice. Increasing costs for labor and restricted supplies of irrigation water has caused farmers to shift from manual transplanting of seedlings to direct-seeding in many Asian countries (Pandey and Velasco 2005). However, there is risk of greater crop yield losses due to weeds in DSR than in TP rice because of simultaneous emergence of crops and weeds and absence of standing water at the early stages of crop to suppress weed growth (Tuong et al 2005, Chauhan and Johnson 2010).


Nitrogen (N) is one of the most yield limiting nutrients for annual crops around the world and its efficient use is important for economic sustainability of cropping systems. Furthermore, the dynamic nature of N and its propensity for loss from soil-plant systems creates a unique and challenging environment for its efficient management (Fageria and Baligar 2005). Recovery of N in crop plant is usually less than 50 % worldwide (Raun and Johnson 1999). This has led to environmental contamination and concerns regarding use of N fertilizers. The low recovery of N is associated with its loss by leaching, volatilization, de-nitrification and erosion of the soil. Mahajan and Timsina (2011) at Ludhiana observed that DSR required more N than TP rice. Besides rate and timing of N application is important crop management practice for improving N use efficiency and crop yields (Fageria and Baligar 2005).

Zhang et al (2009) showed that less N application before anthesis and more N application at or after anthesis may increase post anthesis dry matter accumulation and grain filling.  The most appropriate time of N application to rice is panicle initiation, which produced maximum plant height, grains/panicle and grain yield (Bacon 1980, Inthavongra et al 1985).

Late application of N delayed the synthesis of abscisic acid, promotes cytokinin activity and causes higher chlorophyll retention and photosynthesis activity in leaves for supply of photosynthates to grains (Sarkar et al 2007).  Various workers reported that N application during the post-anthesis phase, it is possible to increase the protein content of rice grains, improving their nutritive quality (Souza et al 1993). Souza et al (1999) observed a negative correlation between grain yield and protein accumulation in rice grains after N application at different times before and after anthesis. Datta et al (1988) evaluated DSR and TP rice under similar N management practices and found that N plant recovery was greater for DSR  than TP rice. Without applied N, grain yield of transplanted rice was lower than that of DSR. These results suggest that considerable potential exists to increase N use efficiency and grain yield in DSR by manipulating N fertilizer management practices. The use of N fertilizer  in the form of urea in flooded rice has increased rapidly in recent years but N use efficiency (NUE) is seldom more than 40 % of applied N (Crasswell and Datta 1980). Poor utilization of fertilizer N by rice is thought to be largely due to N losses from the soil-plant system through NH4+ volatilization, nitrification, de-nitrification, runoff and leaching (Tripathi et al 1999).

Adequate leaf N should be maintained throughout the growing period of rice, which is critical for achieving high yield (Olfs et al 2005). These crop demand-driven, site-specific N applications can add to farmer’s productivity and profits (Singh et al 2002). The N had a beneficial effect on phosphorus uptake by rice, which was mainly associated with increase in yield and greater exploitation of available pool of phosphorus (P) from the soil (Majumdar et al 2005).

N is an important component of rice production technology with high yielding varieties but N use efficiency is very low as it is lost through leaching (Prakasa Rao and Prasad 1980), runoff, ammonia volatization (Prasad et al 1999)  and denitrification (Aulakh et al 1992).

The mean N fertilizer response was the highest at 40 kg N/ha as compared to other N levels (0, 20, and 60 kg N/ha), indicating that further increase in N level had no effect on crop response to fertilizer. The mean grain yield was increased by 64.2 % when plots were supplemented with 40 kg N/ha as compared with control (Mahajan et al 2010).

There were significant differences in rice grain yield, quality and water productivity under different water regimes with various N rates (Pan et al 2009). The maximum yield under Rice Intensification System (SRI) was 7.3 t/ha in 2005 and 6.9 t/ha in 2006, respectively with 80 kg N/ha as compared with lower doses of N (Limai et al 2009). However, the finding of another study revealed that the N rates significantly increased the grain yield up to 140 kg N/ha as compared with lower doses of N of 80 and 100 kg/ha but was at par with 160 kg N/ha (Hirzel et al 2011). Similar results were also obtained by Xiang-long et al (2007) and Huang et al (2008).

Increase in N level increased plant height, maximum plant height (104.6 cm) was recorded in plots supplemented with 60 kg N/ha, which was at par with plant height at 40 kg N/ha. Minimum plant height (94.4 cm) was observed in the unfertilized plots. Prasad et al (2003) reported that the effect of N on the growth and yield of early rice and observed that the level of N had significant effect on the plant height, number of tiller/m2, leaf area index (LAI) and dry matter accumulation. Crop growth rate was also increased with the increased with increasing levels of N. Increasing levels of N significantly increased the grain and straw yield up to 80 kg N/ha as compared with lower doses of 40 and 60 kg N/ha but was at par with 100 kg N/ha. In another study, Mannan et al (2010) reported that N level of 75 kg/ha found superior as regards of grain, straw yield, grains/panicle and panicles/m2 than other treatments. Singh et al (1999) observed that application of 90 kg N/ha significantly increased the grain and straw yields of basmati which were at par with 60 kg N/ha and both these were significantly higher as compared to control and 30 kg N/ha. Prasad et al (1992) reported significant response to N was higher but only up to 80 kg/ha, beyond which the differences were non-significant. They also recorded increase in number of tillers, test weight and leaf area index with 80 kg N/ha. Another study reported that each unit increase in N level led to significant increase in growth, yield attributing characters and yield of rice. The maximum grain yield 6.55 t/ha was recorded with highest level of N i.e. 225 kg N/ha. However, maximum response of applied N was observed at 75 kg N/ha and thereafter it decreased with the increase in N level (Shivay and Singh 2002). Similarly, grain yield of wet seeded rice increased significantly with the application of N fertilizer as compared to control.

Another study reported that grain yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by N, maximum yield of 4.7 t/ha was recorded with 80 kg N/ha due to highest number of panicles/m2, increase in panicle length and filled grains/panicle which were significantly superior to 40 kg N/ha and control (Kumar et al 1986). Similar results of increased grain yield with nitrogen have been reported by Lawal and Lawal (2002), Prasad et al (1994), Meelu and Bhandari (1978) and Samui et al (1977). Bhattacharyya and Singh (1992) reported that wet seeded rice responded up to 80 kg N/ha. Increasing N significantly increased the grain and straw yield up to 80 kg N/ha as compared with lower doses of N of 40 and 60 kg /ha but was at par with 100 kg N/ha. Similar results were also recorded by Thakur et al (1988) and Farazi and Mirlohi (2000).

Another study reported that for wet  DSR the N fertilizer rates ranged from 60-120 kg/ha for wet and dry seasons of Philippines (De Datta et al 1998). It was further reported that to maximize the rice productivity, apply N in splits. It helps for efficient mobilization of reserved and current photosynthates for the purpose of grain filling. Increasing grain yield and yield attributes by splitting N application could be attributed to reduction in N losses as well as increase of N recovery and N uptake compared to single dose application (El-Refaee et al 2007). Laroo et al (2007) reported 49.5 and 48.5 % increase in basmati grain yield with the application of 100 and 150 kg N/ha respectively over control. Similar result were obtained by Ehsnullah et al (2001) and reported that 125 kg N/ha produced significantly higher number of grains/panicle, 1000-grain weight and grain yield than that of 100 kg N/ha. However, panicles/m and straw yield were statistically at par with 125 and 100 kg N/ha in fine rice.

Prasad et al (2003) concluded that all yield attributing characters increased significantly with the increase in levels of N from 40 to 100 kg/ha in fine rice. However, application of 100 kg N/ha significantly increased the plant height, total number of tillers/hill, dry matter production, grain and straw yields. Another study reported that the grain yield of rice increased significantly with the application of 100 kg N/ha over 50 kg N/ha (Verma et al 2008). It has been reported that application of 100 kg N/ha gave 15.5, 2.5 and 6.5 q/ha more grain yield than those of control, 50 and 150 kg N/ha, respectively (Singh et al 1997).

Another study reported that increase in level of N brought significantly improvement in rice yield and yield attributes even up to 120 kg N/ha. There has been 29.6, 50.7 and 59.6 % increase in yield owing to 40, 80, 120 kg N/ha over the control (Paikaray et al 2001). Kumar et al (2007) reported that application of 120 kg N/ha produced significantly higher grain yield as compared to control but was at par grain yield obtained with 180 kg N/ha. The similar results were also reported by Dhal and Mishra (1993), Murthy et al (1992), Thakur (1989), Reddy and Reddy (1989), Thakur et al (1988), Dalal and Dixit (1987) and Pandey and Singh (1985).

Singh et al (2007) obtained response up to 120 kg N/ha, where applied N fertilizer increased grain yield of direct seeded rice by 62 % compared to control. Beyond 120 kg N/ha, no increase in grain yield was observed but its application resulted in more production of rice straw.

Another study reported that the successive increase in N application significantly increased the grain and straw yields up to 120 kg N/ha and increased grain yield of DSR by 62 % as compared with control. The application of 120 kg N/ha gave significantly higher grain and straw yields over 40 kg N/ha (Sharma et al 2007). These results are in concurrence with the finding of Alegeson and Siddeswaran (2002). Naw et al (2007) reported the effect of N on the productivity of aromatic rice was increase in grain yield with the application of 100 and 150 kg N/ha over control (2.0 and 1.95 t/ha). It was 49.5 and 48.5 per cent more, respectively. The beneficial effect of N application on various yield attributing characters viz. number of panicle/hill, panicle weight, panicle length, number of filled grain/panicle and 1000-grain weight led to increased grain yield with increasing levels of N. Significantly higher yield at the higher level of N obtained owing to the better N uptake which led to greater dry matter production (Chopra and Chopra 2000). Similar kinds of results were also reported by Rammohan et al (2002) and Om et al (1999).

It has been concluded that the successive increments of N significantly increased the grain and straw yield up to 120 kg N/ha as compared to 160 kg N/ha (Singh and Tripati 2007). Similar results were also showed by Thakur (1993) that increasing levels of N increased plant height, effective tillers/m2 and grains/panicle significantly up to 120 kg N/ha whereas length of panicle and 1000-grain weight increased only up to 80 kg N/ha.

It has been reported that a significant increase in grain and straw yield of rice when the rate of N application was increased from 0-120 kg N/ha (Singh and Sharma 2000). Further increase in N application from 120 to 180 kg N/ha had no significant effect on the grain and straw yield of rice.

Reddy and Reddy (1989) observed that the number of panicles, filled grains/panicle and test weight increased with 40-120 kg N/ha as compared to control. Similarly, increasing levels of N increased growth and yield attributes significantly.

Sharma et al (2007) reported that application of 120 kg N/hagave significantly higher grain and straw yields over 40 kg N/ha. Murthy et al (1992) laid out an experiment to know the influence of N levels on rice and started that the productivity of rice was lowest in control (3.5 t/ha) and gradually increased to 5.5 t/ha with an increase in nitrogen levels up to 120 kg N/ha. The increase was owing to vigorous growth and increased physiological efficiency at higher N levels. Similarly, the application of 120 kg N/ha significantly increased the grain yield of rice as compared to the lower (60 kg N/ha) and higher doses (180 kg N/ha).

An increase in N from 80 to 120 kg N/ha in rice significantly increased the plant height, total tillers, dry matter accumulation, panicle number, filled grains/panicle, N-uptake as well as grain and straw yields, the highest level of N i.e. 160 kg/ha however did not improve these characters (Kumar et al 1995). Lawal and Lawal (2002) from Nigeria reported that application of fertilizer up to 80 kg N/ha significantly increased crop growth rate, number of ear bearing tillers/m2, and per cent filled grains of rice. However, plant height, test weight, grain weight/panicleand grain yield responded up to 120 kg N/ha. Patel et al (1986) recorded that N application significantly increased the grain yield with increasing levels up to 180 kg N/ha. However, considering the economics, application of 120 kg N/ha was found to be more remunerative than 180 kg N/ha. The response per kg of N was 17.6 and 16.7 kg of rough grain at 120 and 180 kg N/ha, respectively.

It has also been concluded that the concentration of N in flag leaf was positively correlated with the amount of N applied and also reported that grain yield, 1000- grain weight and panicle number in dry seeded rice increased with increase in amount of N applied up to 150 kg/ha (Jong et al 1999). Ramesh et al (2009) revealed that application of 150 kg N/ha registered significantly higher number of tillers, panicles, filled grains/panicle, 1000-grain weight and grain yield than 100 kg N/ha. Similarly, Gautam et al (2005) observed the highest grain (5.27 t/ha) and straw (7.41 t/ha) yields with the application of 160 kg N/ha in coarse rice. Rice grain yield increased significantly as N rate increased up to 160 kg/ha irrespective of establishment methods (Singh et al 2002). Deshmukh and Tiwari (1996) reported that the grain yield of rice increased significantly with increasing levels of N from 40 to 160 kg/ha. This is due to the beneficial effect on growth and biomass production.

Sathiya et al (2008) reported that the application of 175 kg N/ha resulted in higher growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield as compared to 100 and 125 kg N/ha. Crop growth rate was also increased with the increasing N level. Khan et al (2006) reported linear increase in grain yield up to 180 kg N/ha. N dose of 180 kg/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield of rice as compared to lower dose of 60, 120 and 150 kg N/ha. This was mainly attributed to the higher number of panicles/m2 and grain/panicle. Higher N dose of 240 kg/ha resulted in lodging of crop at maturity which declined the grain yield of rice.

N use efficiency when used to indicate the overall efficiency of N is defined as the ratio of biological yield or economic yield to the fertilizer N used. The biological yield can include either above ground plant dry matter or plant N, whereas the economic yield includes either grain yield or total plant N. More commonly used measures of NUE are: agronomic efficiency (AE), recovery efficiency (RE), and physiological efficiency (PE), computed by different methods. The ratio of increased yield to N applied is commonly referred to as agronomic efficiency of N. A review of worldwide data on NUE for cereal crop from researcher-managed experiment plots reported single year fertilizer recovery efficiency of 57 % for wheat and 46 per cent for rice (Ladha et al 2005).

Application of N fertilizer increased grain yield of rice when the rice was exposed to water deficit (Castillo et al 2006). In rice production, efficient use of N fertilizer is a critical factor in achieving high and stable yield, while minimizing negative effects to the environment (Ntamatungiro et al 1999, Hirel and Lemaire 2005, Tylaran et al 2009).  Mahajan and Timsina (2011) at Ludhiana observed that DSR  (non-basmati) required more N than TP rice. Besides rate and timing of N application is important crop management practice for improving N use efficiency and crop yields (Fageria and Baligar 2005). Sahrawat (1979) reported that mineral N through inorganic fertilizer was more susceptible to different type of  N losses and hence it had low N use efficiency as compared to organic materials. There is continuous supply of N by organic manures and tying up of in organic soil N prevents its loss through denitrification, volatilization or leaching (Gill and Meelu 1982 and Singh 1984). Integrated approaches of organic and inorganic nutrients management have shown as increased efficiency of applied N fertilizer in rice (Buresh and De Datta 1991). Recovery efficiency of applied N was quite closer in case of organics and inorganics. This is because of minimal loss of N in case of organic sources and N was available to the crop for longer period.

Crop residue

Crop residues may be incorporated partially or completely into the soil depending upon methods of cultivation. Ploughing is the most efficient residue incorporation method. Unlike removal or burning, incorporation of straw increases soil organic matter and soil N, P and K contents. In few studies, rice yield was lower during the first one to three years of rice straw incorporation 30 days prior to rice planting because of immobilization of soil N in presence of crop residues with wide C/N ratio but in later years, straw incorporation did not affect yield adversely.

Accumulation of organic matter and nutrients near the soil surface under NT and reduced tillage  were favorable consequences of not inverting the soil and by maintaining a mulch layer on the soil surface (Tebrugge and During 1999). With annual plough less tillage, plant residues will be left on the soil surface, resulting in increased organic matter in the top soil (Rasmussen 1999). The study by Gosai et al (2009) revealed higher concentration of soil organic matter in the no-till and shallow-tilled plots compared to the other conventionally tilled plots that confirms to the finding of Doran (1987), Robbins and Voss (1991) and Angers et al (1995).

More plant residues were left on or near the soil surface no-tillage, which led to lower evapotranspiration and higher content of soil water in the upper (0-10cm) soil layer (Rasmussen 1999). The plant available water content was significantly higher with ZT than CT in rice-wheat cropping system (Bhattacharyya et al 2006 and Bhattacharyya et al 2008). Surface residues maintained under ZT system moderate moisture fluctuations and thus reduce both evaporation and runoff (Blevins and Frye 1993). However, different types and extent of tillage did not have any major influence on the moisture content at harvest, although it was high at the time of initial tillage and reduced with subsequent tillage operations (Srivastava et al 2000). It has been well established that increasing amounts of crop residues on the soil surface reduce the evaporation rate (Gill and Jalota 1996; Prihar et al 1996). Residue mulch or partial incorporation in soil by conservation tillage has also been shown to increase the infiltration by reducing surface sealing and decreasing runoff velocity (Box et al 1996).

Aeration is important for both the agricultural and environmental functions of soil. Plant roots and soil fauna require oxygen, and aerobic microbes are important decomposers. Air permeability is a measure of how easily air convection occurs through soil in response to pressure gradients. Pressure gradients can be generated naturally by air turbulence above the soil surface, and this can lead to air flows through the tilled layers of soils especially when they contain pores larger than about 5 mm (Farrell et al 1966; Kimball and Lemon 1971). Air flow will occur only if there is a continuous network of air filled pores. Air permeability is the useful indicator of pore connectivity. Air permeability decreases with increase in soil bulk density in no tillage just beneath the depth of tillage (Rasmussen 1999).

The major disadvantage of incorporation of cereal straw is the immobilization of inorganic N and its adverse effect due to N-deficiency. The combined use of rice or wheat straw and inorganic fertilizer can however, increase the yield of rice and wheat in rice-wheat systems. Of course, proper fertilizer management practices can reduce N immobilization due to incorporation of crop residues into the soil. These practices include appropriate method, time and rate of fertilizer-N application: i) placement of N fertilizer below the surface soil layer that is enriched with carbon after incorporation of crop residue, ii) application of N fertilizer at a higher rate than the recommended rate, and iii) application of N 15-20 kg/haas starter dose with straw incorporation increases yields of wheat and rice compared with either burning of straw or its incorporation in the soil.

The yield obtained with wheat residue incorporation with 80 kg N/ha was statistical at par with cowpea in crop rotation and significantly higher than that under the control and statistically similar to that of no organic N and 120 kg N/ha (Paikaray et al 2001). It indicated that saving of 40kg N/ha when we incorporate the residue in field. Higher yield with supply of organic N might be attributing to more nutrient availability with its incorporation to rice crop. These results were in close conformity with the finding of Thakur et al (1995) and Beri et al (1989).

Sharma (2002) concluded that application of 40 kg N/ha (one third of the total dose for rice) at the time of wheat residue incorporation, 40 kg N/ha at the time of transplanting and rest at panicle initiation increased the grain yield by 0.5-0.7 t/ha, straw yield 0.5 1.0 t/ha, N uptake by 10 kg/ha, apparent N recovery by 10 % and agronomic efficiency of N by 5-7 kg grain/kg fertilizer-N over no N application at the time of incorporation of wheat residue was better conserved and resulted in higher available N content in soil that N applied along with transplanting. Advantage of incorporation of wheat residue over its removal or burning was seen only when 40 kg N/ha was applied at the time of its incorporation. Wheat incorporation and FYM with higher doses of fertilizer N increased the available N, P and K content in soil compared with initial values, whereas in control plots they declined significantly (Bhat et al 1991).

Mulching involves covering of soil surface to conserve moisture, control weeds and increase the population of micro-flora thereby augmenting the crop yield (Banik and Sharma 2008). It also increases the soil water storage in the root zone and ultimately the yield. The average grain yield was 2.65% higher in the residue incorporation treatment as compared with without residue treatment. However, the effect of straw incorporation on the characteristics of growth and development has been rarely reported in rice, especially in direct-seeding rice (Guo-Wei et al 2009).

Grain and straw yields of rice were affected significantly. Wheat straw was applied 5 or 10 t/ha alone gave better grain yield of rice than the control. Increased application of chemical fertilizer alone, from 50 to 75 and 100 % of the recommended dose of N, also increased yield significantly. Combined application of wheat straw either applied 5 or 10 t/ha with increasing dose of N too increased the grain and straw yields of rice (Kumar et al 2003).


  1. Alegeson A and Siddeswaran K.  Studies on optimizing nitrogen levels and time of application for wet-seeded rice. (in) Abs International Rice Congress held during 16-19 September 2002, Beijing, China, Pp-407 (2002).
  2. Angers D A, Voroney R P, and Cote D.  Dynamics of soil organic matter and corn residues affected by tillage practices. Soil Sci Soc America J 59: 1311-1315 (1995).
  3. Anonymous. Area and production of rice in India. (2013a)
  4. Anonymous. Package of Practices for Kharif Crops. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (2013b).
  5. Aulakh M S, Doran J W and Mosier A R. Soil denitrification-significance, measurement and effects of management. Adv Soil Sci 18: 1-57 (1992).
  6. Bacon P E. Nitrogen application strategies for rice. Proc Aust Agron. Conf  Lawas, Australia. Field Crop Absts 36: 4404; 1983] (1980).
  7. Balasubramanian V and Hill J. Direct wet seeding of rice in Asia. Emergence issues and strategic research needs for the 21st century. In: Proc Annual Workshop of Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad (2002).
  8. Banik P and Sharma R C. Effect of integrated nutrient management with mulching on rice (Oryza sativa) –based cropping system in rainfed Eastern plateau area. Indian J Agric Sci 78: 240-243 (2008).
  9. Bayer C, Mielniczuk J, Amado T J C, Martin-Neto L and Fernandes S V. Organic matter storage in a sandy clay loam Acrisol affected by tillage and cropping systems in southern Brazil. Soil & Till Res 54: 101–109 (2000).
  10. Bazaya B R, Sen Avijit and Srivastava V K. Planting methods and Nitrogen effects on crop yield and soil quality under direct seeded rice in the Indo-Gangetic plains of Eastern India. Soil & Till Res 105: 27-32 (2009).
  11. Beri V, Meelu O P and Khind C S. Studies on Sesbania aculeate Pers, as green manure for N-accumulation and substitution of fertilizer-N in wetland rice. Tropical Agric, UK 66: 209-212 (1989).
  12. Bhat A K, Beri V and Sindhu B S. Effect of long term recycling of crop residues on soil productivity of crop residues on soil productivity. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 39: 380-382 (1991).
  13. Bhattacharaya H C and Singh K N. Response of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) to the level and time of nitrogen application. Indian J Agric Sci 37: 681-685 (1992).
  14. Bhattacharaya R, Singh R D, Chandra S, Kundu S and Gupta H SEffect of tillage and irrigation on yield and soil properties under rice (Oryza sativa)- wheat (Triticum aestivum) system on a sandy clay loam soil of Uttaranchal. Indian J Agric Sci 76: 405-409. (2006).
  15. Bhattacharyya R, Kundu S, Pandey S C, Singh K P and Gupta H S. Tillage and irrigation effects on crop yields and soil properties under the rice–wheat system in the Indian Himalayas. Agric water management 95: 993-1002(2008).
  16. Bhuiyan S I, Sattar M A and Tabbal D F . Wet seeded rice: water use efficiency and productivity and constraints to wider adoption. In Moody (ed) Constraints, Opportunities and innovations for wet seeded rice, Los Banos (Phillipines): IRRI Pp: 143-55 (1995).
  17. Biederbeck V O, Campbell C A, Bowren K E, Schnitzer M and Melver R N. Effect of burning cereal straw on soil properties and grain yield in Saskatchewan. Soil Sci Soc America J 44: 103-111 (1980).
  18. Blake G R. Bulk density. In (CA Black, DD Evans, J L White, L E Ensminger and F E Clark, eds) Methods of soil analysis Part I, physical and menerological properties. American Soc Agron, Inc Madison, Wisconsin USA (1965).
  19. Blevins R L and Frye W F. Conservation tillage: an ecological approach to soil management. Adv Agron 51: 34-77 (1993).
  20. Box J E Bruce R R and Agassi M The effect of surface cover on infiltration and soil erosion. In “Soil Erosion Conservation and Rehabilitation” ( M. Agassi.ed.) pp.107-123.Dekker, New York (1996).
  21. Budhar M N and Tamilselvan N. Evaluation of stand establishment techniques in low land rice. International Rice Res Notes 26: 72-73(2001).
  22. Buresh R J and De Datta S K. Nitrogen dynamics and management of rice-legume cropping system. Adv Agron 45: 1-59 (1991).
  23. Castillo E G, Tuong T P, Inbushi K and Padilla J. Drought response of dry seeded rice to water stress timing and nitrogen fertilizer rates and source. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52: 496-508 (2006).
  24. Chauhan B S and Johnson D E. The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv Agron 105: 221-262 (2010).
  25. Chopra N K and Chopra N. Effect of row spacing and nitrogen level on growth, yield and seed quality of scented rice under transplanted conditions. Indian J Agron 45: 304-308 (2000).
  26. Cochran W G and Cox G M. Experimental Designs, Asia Publishing House, New Delhi (1967).
  27. Crasswell E T and De Datta S K. Recent developments in research on nitrogen fertilizers for rice. IRRI Research Paper Series No. 49, Pp: 11(1980).
  28. Crusciol C A C, Mateus G P, Nascente A S, Martins P O, Borghi E and Pariz C M. An innovative crop-forage intercrop system: early cycle soybean cultivars and palisadegrass. Agron J 104: 1085–1095 (2012)..
  29. Dalal P K and Dixit L. Response of medium duration rice varieties to the levels of nitrogen. Indian J Agron 32: 286-287 (1987).
  30. De Datta S K, Bolton F R and Lin W L LProspects for using minimum and zero tillage in tropical lowland rice. Weed Res 19: 9-15 (1979)..
  31. De Datta S K, Buresh R J, Samson M I and Wang K R. Nitrogen use efficiency and N-15 balances in broadcast seeded flooded and transplanted rice.  Soil Sci Soc America J 52: 849-855 (1988).
  32. De Datta S K, Buresh R J, Samson M L and Wang K. Nitrogen-use efficiency and nitrogen-15 balances in broadcast-seeded and transplanted rice. Soil Sci Soc America J 52: 849-855(1998).
  33. Deshmukh S C and Tiwari S C. Efficiency of slow releasing nitrogen fertilizer in rice (Oryza sativa) on partially reclaimed vertisol. Indian J Agron 41: 586-590 (1996).
  34. Dhal P and Misra G. Effect of nitrogen on grain filling and yield of rice. Oryza 30: 162-164.
  35. Doran J W (1987) Microbial biomass and mineralizable nitrogen distribution in no tillage and plowed soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 5: 68-75 (1993).
  36. Duxbury J M, Abrol I P, Gupta R K and Bronson K. Analysis of long-term soil fertility experiments in rice-wheat rotation in South Asia. (in) Long-term soil fertility experiments in rice-wheat cropping system. In: I P Abrol, K Bronson, J M Duxbury, and R K Gupta (eds). RWC Research Serial no. 6, New Delhi, India (2000).
  37. Ehsanullah, Attaullah, Cheema M S and Usman M. Rice Basmati-385 response to single and split application of nitrogen at different growth stages. Pakistan J Agric Sci 38: 84-86(2001).
  38. Elliot P C, Navarez D C, Estario D B and Moody K. Determining suitable weed control practices for dry-seeded rice. Philipp J Weed Sci 11: 70–82(1984).
  39. 39.  El-Refaee I S, EL-Wahab A E ABD, Mahrous F N and Ghanem S A. Irrigation management and splitting of nitrogen application as affected on grain yield and water productivity of hybrid inbred rice. African Crop Sci Conf Proc 8: 45-52 (2007).
  40. Estorninos Jr, L E and Moody K. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in dry-seeded wetland rice (Oryza sativa). Philipp J Weed Sci 15: 50-58 (1988).
  41. Fageria N K. Optimal nitrogen fertilization timing for upland rice. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1-6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia Pp- 176-179 (2010).
  42. Fageria N K and Baligar V C. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Adv Agron 88: 97-185 (2005).
  43. Farazi A and Mirlohi A. Effect of splitting and rate of nitrogen application on yield and yield component of rice (Oryza sativa L). Field Crop Abs 53: 325 (2000).
  44. Farrell D A, Greaten E L and Gurr C G. Vapour transfer in soil due to air turbulence. Soil Sci 102: 303-315 (1966).
  45. Fujisaka S, Moody K and Ingram K. A descriptive study of farming practices for dry seeded rainfed lowland rice in India, Indonesia and Myanmar. Agric Ecosyst Environ 45: 115–128 (1993).
  46. Gangwar K, Chaudhary V P ,Gangwar B and Pandey D K.  Effect of methods of establishment and tillage practices in rice (Oryza sativa) based cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci 79: 334-349 (2009).
  47. Gautam A K, Mishra B N, Sarkar N C and Mishra P K. Effect of graded levels of nitrogen and plant spacing on grain yield and quality of aromatic rice. Ann Agric Res New Series 26: 402-405 (2005).
  48. Gill B S and Jalota S K. Evaporation from soil in relation to residue rate, mixing depth, soil texture and evaporativity. Soil Technol 8: 293-301 (1996).
  49. Gill M S and Meelu O P. Studies on the substitution of inorganic fertilizers with organic manures and their effect on the soil fertility in rice-wheat rotation. Fertilizer Research 3: 303-14 (1982).
  50. Gill M S, Kumar A and Kumar P. Growth and yield of rice cultivars under various methods and time of sowing. Indian J Agron 51: 123-127 (2006).
  51. Goel A C and Verma K S. Comparative study of direct seeded rice and transplanted rice. Indian J Agric Res 34: 194-196 (2000).
  52. Gosai K, Arunachalam A and Dutta B K. Influence of conservation tillage on soil physicochemical properties in a tropical rainfed agricultural system of northeast India. Soil & Till Res 105: 63-71 (2009).
  53. Graham J P, Ellis F B, Christian D G and Cannel R O. Effect of straw residues on the establishment and yield of autumn sown cereals. J Agri Engg Res 3: 39-49 (1986).
  54. Guo-Wei XU, Gui-Lu TAN, Zhi-Gin WANG, Li-Jnu LIU, and Jian-chang YANG . Effect of wheat residue management and site specific nitrogen management on growth and development in Direct seeded rice. Acta Agron Sin 35: 685-694 (2009).
  55. Gupta R K, Naresh R K, Hobbs P R, Jiaguo Z and Ladha J K. Sustainability of post-green revolution agriculture: the rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains and China (2003).
  56. Hirel B and Lemaire G. From agronomy and ecophysiology to molecular genetics for improving nitrogen use efficiency in crops. In: Goyal S, Tischner R, Basra A (Eds.) Enhancing the Efficiency of Nitrogen Utilization in Plants. Food Product Press, New York. Pp. 213-257 (2005).
  57. Hirzel J, Pedreros A and Cordero K. Effect of nitrogen rates and split nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and its components in flooded rice. Chilean J Agric Res 71: 437-444 (2011).
  58. Huang J, He F, Cui K, Buresh R, Xu B, Gong W and Peng S. Determination of optimal nitrogen rate for rice varieties using a chlorophyll meter. Field Crop Res 105: 70-80(2008).
  59. Humphreys E, Meisner C, Gupta R K, Tinsina J, Beecher H G, Tang Y L, Singh Y, Gill M A, Masih I, Guo Z I and Thompson J A. Water savings in rice-wheat systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia (2004).
  60. Inthavongra K, Yasve T, Moruwaki T, Watabe T and Imai K. Studies on the formation of yield and yield components in Indica rice. I. Response to nitrogen application in a local and improved varieties. Jap J Tropical Agric 29: 131-139 (1985).
  61. IRRI. IRRI towards 2000 and beyond. IRRI Manila Philippines (1989).
  62. Jackson. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi (1967).
  63. Janiya J D and Moody K. Effect of time of planting, crop establishment method and weed control method on weed growth and rice yield. Philipp J Weed Sci 15: 6-17 (1988).
  64. Jong G W, Chung D C and Lee S C. Interaction between N application and water management in dry seeded ricePlant Prod Sci 2:109-114 (1999).
  65. Khan U, Mishra B, Pachauri P and Kumar Y. Effect of integrated nitrogen management on yield and nitrogen nutrition of irrigated rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci 76: 176-180 (2006).
  66. Kimball B A and Lemon E R. Air turbulence effects upon soil gas exchange. Soil Sci Soc America Proc 35:16-21 (1971).
  67. Kumar G S, Reddy N S and Ikrammullah M Effect of methods of seeding and nitrogen level on performance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under late planting. Indian J Agric Sci 65: 354-355 (1995).
  68. Kumar M, Singh R P and Rana N S. effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrition on productivity of rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron 48: 175-177 (2003).
  69. Kumar N, Prasad R and Zaman F U. Relative response of high yielding variety and a hybrid of rice to levels and sources of nitrogen. Proc Indian Nat Sci Acad 73: 1-6 (2007).
  70. Kumar R S, Reddy R M, Reddy M M and Reddy B B. Nitrogen Management in direct seeded and transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Agron 31: 100-101 (1986).
  71. Kumar V, Yadav A and Malik R K. Effect of planting methods and herbicides in transplanted rice. In: Proc Accelaration of Resource Conservation Technologies in Rice-wheat Systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. June 1-2, 2005 (2005).
  72. Ladha J K, Pathak H, Krupnik T J, Six J and Kessel C van. Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospect’s and prospects. Adv Agron 87: 85-156 (2005).
  73. Laroo N M, Shivay Y S and Kumar D. Effect of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on yield attributes, productivity and nutrient uptake of aromatic rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci 77: 772-775 (2007).
  74. Lawal M I and Lawal A B. Influence of nitrogen rate and placement method on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) at Kadawa, Nigeria. Crop Res 23: 403-411 (2002).
  75. Limai Z, Lianghuan W U, Yongshan L I, XinghuaL U, Defeng Z H U and Norman U P H O F F. Influence of the system of rice intensification on rice yield and water use efficiency with different nitrogen application rates. Expl Agric 45: 275–286 (2009).
  76. Mabbayad B B and Buencosa I A. Tests on minimal tillage of transplanted rice. Philipp Agric 51: 541-551 (1967).
  77. Mahajan G and Timsina J. Effect of nitrogen rates and weed control methods on weeds abundance and yield of direct-seeded rice. Arch Agron Soil Sci 57: 239-250 (2011).
  78. Mahajan G, Sekhon N K, Singh N, Kaur R, Sidhu A S. Yield and nitrogen-use efficiency of aromatic rice cultivars in response to nitrogen fertilizer. J  New Seeds 11: 356-368 (2010).
  79. Majumdar B, Venkatesh M S, Kumar K and Patiram. Nitrogen requirement for low land rice (Oryza sativa) in valley lands of Meghalaya. Indian J Agric Sci 75: 504-506 (2005).
  80. Mannan M A, Bhuiya M S U, Hossain H M A and Akhand M I M. Optimization of nitrogen rate for aromatic basmati rice (Oryza sativa L). Bangladesh J Agril Res 35: 157-165 (2010).
  81. Meelu O P and Bhandari A L. Fertilizer management of paddy in North India. Fertil News 23: 3-10 (1978).
  82. Mittra M K and Pieris J W L. Paraquat as an aid to paddy cultivation. Proc Br weed Control Conf 9: 668-74 (1968).
  83. Moorthy B T S and Manna G B. Studies on weed control in direct seeded upland rainfed rice. Indian J Agric Res 27: 175-180 (1993).
  84. Murthy P S S, Ramesh K S, Rao G V H and Narayanan A. Influence of nitrogen on grain filling potential and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. Indian J Agron 37: 157-158 (1992).
  85. Naw M L O, Shivay Y S, Kumar D, Prasad R and Pandey R N. Effect of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on productivity and nutrient uptake in aromatic rice. Indian J Fertil 2: 29-33 (2007).
  86. Ntamatungiro S, Norman R J, McNew R W and Wells B R. Comparison of plant measurements for estimating nitrogen accumulation and grain yield by flooded rice. Agron J 91: 676-685 (1999).
  87. Olfs H W, Blankenau K, Brentup F, Jasper J and Lammel J. Soil and plant based nitrogen fertilizer recommendations in arable farming. J plant Nutr Soil Sci 168: 414-431 (2005).
  88. 88.  Olk D C, Casman K G, Randall E W, Kinchesh P, Sanger L, J and Anderson J M. Change in the chemical properties of organic matter in tropical lowland soils. Environ J Soil Sci 47: 293-303 (1996).
  89. Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watanable F S and Dean L A. Estimation of available phosphorus by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA circ 939: 1-19 (1954).
  90. Om H, Katyal S K and Dhiman S D. Effect of methods of raising of nursery and nitrogen levels on grain yield of hybrid rice. Oryza 36: 179-181 (1999).
  91. Paikaray R L, Mahapatra B S and Sharma G L. Integrated nitrogen management in rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum astivum) cropping system. Indian J Agron 46: 592-600 (2001).
  92. Pan S, Cao C, Cai M, Wang J, Wang R, Zhai J and Huang S. Effects of irrigation regime and nitrogen management on grain yield, quality and water productivity in rice. J Food Agric Environ 7: 559-564 (2009).
  93. Pandey J and Singh R P. Response of newly developed medium duration and high yielding rice genotypes to nitrogen. Indian J Agron 30: 114-116 (1985).
  94. Pandey S and Velasco L. Trends in crop establishment methods in Asia and research issues (2005).
  95. Patel R B, Patel C L, Patel Z G, Patel I G and Naik A G. Response of rice varieties to nitrogen and phosphorus in summer season. Indian J Agron 31: 211-212 (1986).
  96. Pellerin  K J and Webster E P.  Imazethapyr at different rates and timings in drill and water seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Technol 18: 223–227 (2004).
  97. Peng S, Khush G S and Cassman K G.) Evaluation of the new plant ideotype for increased yield potential. In: K G Cassman (ed.) Breaking the potential in favourable environment. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines pp 5-26 (1994.
  98. Piggin C M, Gracia C O and Janiya J D. Establishment of irrigated rice under zero and conventional tillage system in the Philippines in ProcInt workshop on herbicide resistance management and zero tillage in rice-wheat system. March 4-6,2002, Hisar, India: 190-95 (2002).
  99. Piper C S. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay (1966).
  100. Prakasa Rao E V S and Prasad R. Nitrogen leaching from conventional and new nitrogenous fertilizers in lowland rice culture. Pl Soil 57: 383-392 (1980).
  101. Prasad D, Singh J P, Singh J K and Bharti V. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on growth and yield of early rice (Oryza sativa L). RAU J Res 13: 148-150 (2003).
  102. Prasad P, Kumar A and Prasad U K. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on yield of medium duration direct seeded rice. Indian J Agron 39: 294-296 (1992).
  103. Prasad R and Power J F. Crop residue management. Adv Soil Sci 15: 205-251 (1991).
  104. Prasad R, Singh D K, Singh R K and Rani Archana. Ammonia volatilization loss in rice-wheat cropping system and ways to minimize it. Fert News 44: 53-56 (1999).
  105. Prihar S S, Jalota S K and Steiner J L. Residue management for reducing evaporation in relation to soil type and evaporativity. Soil Use Manag 12:150-157 (1996).
  106. Ramesh T, Sathiya K, Padmanaban P K and Martin G J. Optimization of nitrogen and suitable weed management practice for aerobic rice. Madras Agric J 96: 344-348 (2009).
  107. Rammohan J, Chandrasekharan B, Subramaniam M, Poonguzhalan R and Mohan R. Influence of nitrogen on growth and yield of rice in coastal saline soils of Karaikal region. Oryza 37: 89-91 (2002).
  108. Rasmussen  K J. Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: A Scandinavian review. Soil & Till Res 53: 3-14 (1999).
  109. Raun W R and Johnson G V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J 91: 357-363 (1999).
  110. Reddy C V. Crop establishment techniques in rice under different environments in Haryana. Ph.D. Thesis, CCSHAU, Hisar, India. pp-160 (2004).
  111. Reddy C V, Malik R K and Yadav A.  Evaluation of double zero tillage in rice-wheat cropping system. In: Proc Accelaration of Resource Conservation Technologies in rice-wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. CCS HAU, Hisar June 1-2, 2005 (2005).
  112. Reddy G R S and Reddy K A. Effect of levels and sources of nitrogen on rice. Indian J Agron 34: 364-366 (1989).
  113. Robbins S G and Voss R D. Phosphorus and potassium stratification in conservation tillage systems. J Soil Water Con 46: 298-300 (1991).
  114. Rodriguez M and Lal R. Tillage/fertility interactions in paddy p 349-56. In Lal R (ed) Soil tillage and crop production. Proc Series 2 IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria (1979).
  115. Roy D K and Mishra S S. Effect of weed management in direct-seeded, upland rice (Oryza sativa) at varying nitrogen levels. Indian J Agron 44: 105-108 (1999).
  116. Saharawat Y S, Singh S, Malik R K, Ladha J K, Gathala M, Jat M L and Kumar V. Evaluation of alternative tillage and crop establishment methods in rice-wheat rotation in North Western Indo Gangetic Plain. Field Crop Res 116: 260-267 (2010).
  117. Sahrawat K L. Ammonium fixation in some tropical rice soils. Soil Sci Plant Annals 10: 1015-28 (1979).
  118. Samui R S, Maiti B K and Jana P K. Effect of nitrogen and Nu-Spartin in pre-kharif rice. Indian J Agron 22: 178-180 (1977).
  119. Sanjay M T, Prabhakarashethy T K and Nanjappo H V. Enhancing productivity of rice (Oryza sativa) under different crop establishment methods through weed management practices. Crop Res 31:192-197 (2006).
  120. Santos N Z, Dieckow J, Bayer C, Molin R, Favaretto N, Pauletti V and Piva J T. Forages, cover crops and related shoot and root additions in no-till rotations to C sequestration in a subtropical Ferralsol. Soil & Till Res 111: 208-218 (2011).
  121. Sarkar R K, Deb N and Parya M K. Effect of seed treatment and foliar nutrition on growth and productivity of spring sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Indian J Agric Sci 77: 191-194 (2007).
  122. Sathiya K, Sathyamoorthi K and Martin G J. Effect of nitrogen levels and split doses on productivity of aerobic rice. Crop Res 9: 527-530 (2008).
  123. Sharma P K, De Datta S K and Redulla C A. Tillage effects on soil physical properties and wetland rice yield. Agron J 80: 34-39 (1988).
  124. Sharma R P, Pathak S K and Singh R C. Effect of nitrogen and weed management in direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa) under upland conditions. Indian J Agron 52: 114-119 (2007).
  125. Sharma S K, Tomar R K and Gangwar K S. Effect of crop-establishment and tillage practices on the yield and economics of irrigated rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system. Indian J Agric Sci 65: 636-638 (1995).
  126. Sharma S N. Nitrogen management in relation to wheat (Triticum aestivum) residue management in rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci 72: 449-452 (2002).
  127. Shivay Y S and Singh S. Effect of planting geometry and nitrogen level on growth, yield and nitrogen-use efficiency of scented hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Agron 48: 42-44 (2002).
  128. Sinclair T N. Nitrogen influence on the physiology of crop yield. (in) Theoretical Production Ecology: Reflections and Prospects. Pp-181 (1990).
  129. Singh D. Studies to moderate the heat stress effects on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity. M.Sc. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India (2010).
  130. Singh G, Singh O P, Kumar V and Kumar T. Effect of methods of establishment and tillage practices on the productivity of rice (Oryza sativa) –wheat (Triticum astivum) cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci 78: 163-166 (2008).
  131. Singh K and Tripathi H P. Effect of nitrogen and weed control practices on performance of irrigated direct seeded rice.  Indian J Agron 52: 231-234 (2007).
  132. Singh K K, Jat S K and Sharma S K. Improving productivity and profitability of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum)  cropping system through tillage and planting management. Indian J Agric Sci 75: 396-399 (2005).
  133. Singh M and Sharma S N. Effect of wheat residue management practices and nitrogen rates on the productivity and nutrients uptake of rice (Orzya sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci 70: 835-839 (2000).
  134. Singh M V, Tripathi H N and Tripathi  H P.   Effect of nitrogen and planting date  on yield and quality of scented rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron 42: 602-606 (1997).
  135. Singh N T. Green manures as a source of nutrients and production. (in) organic matter and rice. International Research Institute, Los Banos, Phillippines, Pp 217-226  (1984).
  136. Singh R, Kamparia N K, Shukla K C and Goswami S R. Effect of nitrogen on yield and yield attributes of scented rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. J Soils Crops 9: 123-124 (1999).
  137. Singh Y, Bharadwaj A K, Singh S P, Singh R K, Chaudhary D C, Saxena A, Singh V, Singh S P and Kumar A. Effect of rice establishment methods, tillage practices in wheat and fertilization on soil physical properties and rice-wheat system productivity on silty clay Mollisol of Uttaranchal. Indian J Agric Sci 72: 200-205 (2002).
  138. Singh Y, Gupta R K, Singh B and Gupta S. Efficient management of nitrogen in wet direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) in northwest India. Indian J Agric Sci 77: 561-564 (2007).
  139. Souza S R, Stark E M L M and Fernandes M S. Effects of supplemental-N on the quality of rice proteins. J Plant Nutr 16: 1739-1751 (1993).
  140. Souza S R, Stark E M L M and Fernandes M S. Foliar spraying of rice with nitrogen: Effect on protein levels, protein fractions and grain weight. J Plant Nutr 22: 579-588(1999).
  141. Srivastava A P, Panwar J S and Garg R N. Influence of tillage on soil properties and wheat productivity in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system .Indian J Agric Sci 70: 207–210 (2000).
  142. Subbiah B V and Asija G L. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Curr sci 25: 259-260 (1956).
  143. Tebrugge F and During A R. Reducing tillage intensity – a review of results from a long-term study in Germany. Soil & Till Res 53: 15-28 (1999).
  144. Thakur R B. Response of medium duration rice varieties to nitrogen. Indian J Agron 34: 491-92 (1989).
  145. Thakur R B. Performance of summer rice (Oryza sativa L.) to varying levels of nitrogen. Indian J Agron 38: 187-190 (1993).
  146. Thakur R B, Mishra S S and Sharma N N. Effect of pesticides on N-use efficiency and growth dynamics in rice. Indian J Agron 33: 181-185 (1988).
  147. Thakur R C, Bindra A D, Sood R D and Bhargava M. Effect of fertilizer application and green manuring on physic-chemical properties of soil and grain yield in rice-wheat crop sequence. Indian J Agron 40: 4-13 (1995).
  148. Timsina J and Connor D J. Productivity and management of rice-wheat cropping systems: issues and challenges. Field crops Res 69: 93-132 (2001).
  149. Tripathi A K, Singh T A and Singh M. Nitrogen use efficiency by rice and floodwqater parameters as affected by modified urea materials. Oryza 36: 49-52 (1999).
  150. Tuong T P, Bouman B A M and Mortimer M. More rice, less water-integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia. Plant Prod Sci 8: 231-241 (2005).
  151. Tylaran R D, Ozawa S, Miyamoto N, Ookawa T, Motobayasi T and Hirasawa T. Performance of a high-yielding modern rice cultivar Takanari and several old and new cultivars grown with and without chemical fertilizer in a submerged paddy field. Plant Pro Sci 12: 365-380 (2009).
  152. Verma A K, Pandey N and Tripathi R S. Effect of planting time and nitrogen level on physiological parameters and grain yield of hybrid rice. Oryza 45: 300-302 (2008).
  153. Walia U S, Singh D and Brar L S. Weed management in rice raised with different sowing techniques. J Res Pb Agric Uni 43: 94-97 (2006).
  154. Xiang-long, P, Yuang-ying L, Sheng-guo L, Li-chun F, Tiansing S and Yan-wen G. Effects of site-specific nitrogen management on yield and dry matter accumulation of rice from cold areas of northeastern China. Agric Sci China 6: 715-723 (2007).
  155. Yadav R L. Factor productivity trends in rice-wheat cropping system under long-term use of chemical fertilizer. Expl Agric 34: 1-18 (1998).
  156. Yoshida S. Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. Pp-269 (1981)  .
  157. Zhang L, Shah L, Bouman B A M, Xue C, Wei F and Tao H. Response of aerobic rice growth and grain yield to N fertilizer at two contrasting sites near Beijing, China. Field Crops Res 114: 45-53 (2009).